It's for patient comfort & the protection of the physician/facility. This is not the function a chaperone provides. I also know female providers who've had to deal with false accusations from crazies. The gender of the provider doesn't matter, I've seen female residents dressed down by attendings for not having a chaperone. It's SOP at every facility I've worked/trained at for a minimum of two staff members wwith one preferably the same gender as the patient to be present for any and all "sensitive" exams - breast, pelvic, anorectal, genital, ect. We generally see men as more dangerous and autonomous than they really are, so we give them too much liability, and we see women as less dangerous and autonomous than they are so we don't give them enough credit. Yes, this is a shortcoming of our culture. we should fight these latent notion that all males are potential predators and only a woman's presence can ensure they behave. Īgain, an ideal world might not be sexist, but sexist policy can be a non-sexist response to a sexist world. should demand evidence from BOTH male and female doctors. However the practical reality is that some doctors do abuse their patients, so there is a practical need for supervision and review of what doctors do to prevent and mitigate this abuse. So, of course doctors shouldn't need to have female chaperones much in the same sense that doctors shouldn't abuse their patients. It's obvious the risk is higher when a male is in a position of power, and it's supported by the evidence.Ī lot of CMV posts are about the gap between some idealized world that we imagine and the practical realities of the one we live in. I'm not saying men should be assumed to be abusers, I'm saying that even though the chance of abuse may be small, it's high enough, and the consequences are harsh enough, that a little extra precaution is necessary.Īnd I think it's foolish to pretend that the risk is equal for males and females. I think that for many women there's enough evidence in life that the chance of abuse by a man is high enough, that chaperones should be made available to them. Sometimes male doctors want someone in the room in case they're accused of mischief by a patient. Women being examined by a female doctor rarely prefer a chaperone. Some women prefer not to have a chaperone, and men rarely want anyone else in the room when being examined. Unfortunately it's just a fact that in general women are more comfortable with a chaperone in the room with a male doctor. Happy CMVing!Īccording to this article, even where chaperones are required for both sexes, in practice they're generally only used for male doctors intimately examining female patients. Speaking of which, downvotes don't change views ! Any questions or concerns? Feel free to message us. If you see a comment that has broken one, it is more effective to report it than downvote it. We'd like to remind you of a couple of things. This is a footnote from the CMV moderators. This carries the ugly implication that the female nurse's testimony is more credible than the doctor's, just because of her gender. How exactly does this work out? If an accusation is made then its still going to be the patient's testimony against both the doctor's and the nurse's. That post confirmed to me that this isn't something that just happened at my college.Įdit 2: I want to challenge the notion that a female nurse being present is a protection against accusations. I've mentioned doctors here but male teachers and nursery workers have the same issues.Įdit 1: here is a current ( ) in the womens sub relevant to this issue. In a more general sense, we should fight these latent notion that all males are potential predators and only a woman's presence can ensure they behave. Perhaps having the procedures filmed, altough that brings another set of privacy issues. If we are going to control the risk of a doctor abusing a patient then we should demand evidence from BOTH male and female doctors. This also creates an unfair advantage towards female doctors because they don't have to spend more on nurses just so they don't get called perverts. Or at least, if a female patient insists on it, they should be expected to cover the additional cost of having ANOTHER highly trained professional in the room. Expecting a female chaperone goes against that notion.Ī nurse's time isn't free and male doctors shouldn't be expected to eat this additional cost just because of a female patient's prejudices. Male doctors have the right to be assumed innocent until they actually infringe their patients integrity. I take issue with normalizing the notion that all male doctors are potential perverts and to prevent this they should always bring a female nurse when examining a female patient.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |